Having researched and studied in the field of class distinctions, man and his reactions in different conditions from humanistic view point, I founded that most of the time the children are who behave instinctively and away from the social relations, so the position of their sleeping may seems more natural and instinctive.
Among middle and upper social classes, necessities of life and more particular, the children’s clothes have the role of showcase of the families’ facilities and culture and as a result of such an unnatural position, the children of such families have the least similarity to the kids. But among the working class who take benefits from the minimum of facilities just for being alive, the clothes and the children’s appearance are free from any ornaments. From this point of view, their lives are similar to live in a casern: to reduce all ornaments due to not having enough time to look after.
Therefore, most of the time the kid is baldhead and his or her only responsibility is to be a “kid”.
The existence of the mother in the works is due to the fact that the mothers’ behaviors are nobler than the fathers’. In this social class, the responsibility of taking care of the kids are imposed on the mothers and she as who should prepare the kid for entering the society, tries to make the kid more familiar with the social relations. On the other hand, the fathers’ behaviors are touristic most of the time and they don’t have any significant role in the process of preparing the kid for entering the society. So, we see just mothers beside the kids.